Divergence of dose-response with asenapine: a cluster analysis of randomized, double-blind, and placebo control study.

BACKGROUND: Differences in psychiatric background and dose-response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia were examined based on efficacy and safety, using data obtained in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia were classified into three clusters by a cluster analysis based on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) subscores at baseline, using the data from a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PANSS Marder factor scores were calculated for each cluster. The efficacy of 10 or 20 mg/day of asenapine on PANSS score was used as the primary endpoint, with the incidence of adverse events evaluated as the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 529 asenapine-treated patients were classified into 3 clusters: Cluster-P with the higher scores in positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and hostility/excitement, Cluster-N with higher scores in negative symptoms, and Cluster-L with overall lower scores. In Cluster-N and Cluster-L, both 10 and 20 mg/day groups showed significant improvement in PANSS scores, while only the 20 mg/day group showed a significant difference in Cluster-P. Cluster-N and Cluster-L had differences in the incidence of adverse events, but this was not seen in Cluster-P. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of asenapine 10 and 20 mg/day differed between the 3 clusters of patients. This suggests that background information regarding baseline psychiatric symptoms may affect the therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia.

Sevoflurane in electroconvulsive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Sevoflurane is the most commonly used inhaled anaesthetic in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive review on how the use of sevoflurane affects seizure adequacy (seizure duration and postictal suppression index [PSI]) and circulatory dynamics in ECT. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs that investigated seizure adequacy and circulatory dynamics in patients treated with ECT using sevoflurane (sevoflurane group) and intravenous anaesthetics (non-sevoflurane group). A total of 12 RCTs (377 patients and 1339 ECT sessions) were included. Sevoflurane significantly decreased the electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure durations in comparison with intravenous anaesthetics, whereas no significant difference was observed in PSI (EEG: 9 studies, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.11 to -0.38, p = 0.0002; PSI: 4 studies, SMD = -0.06, CI -0.13 to 0.25, p = 0.59). The use of sevoflurane in ECT significantly increased heart rate (HR) compared with intravenous anaesthetics (9 studies, SMD = 0.31, CI 012-0.51, p = 0.004). In the pre-planned subgroup analysis, sevoflurane significantly reduced seizure duration compared with other types of anaesthetics, including propofol, barbiturates and ketamine. Furthermore, it was found that the risk of adverse events in ECT with sevoflurane were not significantly different from intravenous anaesthetics (6 studies, risk ratio = 1.33, CI 0.95-1.86, p = 0.09), with agitaion being the most common adverse effects. The results of our study suggest that using sevoflurane for ECT significantly reduces seizure duration, increases maximum HR and brings about no difference in the adverse event risk compared with those using intravenous anaesthetics for ECT. Therefore, there may not be compelling evidence favouring sevoflurane use for ECT, except in cases where intravenous access is difficult.

Brain Volume-Related Polymorphisms of the Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3ß Gene and Their Effect on Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß) polymorphisms are known to influence hippocampal brain tissue volume in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the effects of the GSK-3ß gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in those receiving antidepressant therapy are unknown. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we examined the relationship between brain volume-related SNPs of the GSK-3ß gene and antidepressant treatment effects in patients with MDD. METHODS: Paroxetine, fluvoxamine, or milnacipran was administered to 143 Japanese patients with MDD. Two SNPs of the GSK-3ß gene (rs6438552 and rs12630592) that influence brain volume in the hippocampus were genotyped. For the primary outcome, the relationship between genetic variations in the SNPs and the percent change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score at week 6 was examined. In addition, rs334558, which has been reported repeatedly, was also genotyped. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the two SNPs and the percent change in the HAM-D scores at week 6 (rs6438552 A/A vs. A/G + G/G: p = 0.016; rs12630592 G/G vs. G/T + T/T: p = 0.016). There was high linkage disequilibrium between the rs6438552 and rs12630592 SNPs. The correlation between high therapeutic response over time and the two SNPs were also confirmed (rs6438552 A/A vs. others: p = 0.031; rs12630592 G/G vs. others: p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that two GSK-3ß variants that influence brain volume were associated with changes in the HAM-D scores at week 6 in patients with MDD.

Non response at week 4 as clinically useful indicator for antidepressant combination in major depressive disorder. A sequential RCT.

We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus SSRIs and to assess whether "non-response at week 4" may be a clinical indicator for combining mirtazapine and SSRIs for subsequent treatment. One-hundred fifty-four outpatients with MDD were randomized to receive mirtazapine or SSRIs in step I (4 weeks). Non-responders in step I were randomly assigned to either mirtazapine or SSRIs monotherapy or their combination in step IIa while responders in step I continued the same monotherapy in step IIb for 4 weeks. In step I, mirtazapine showed significantly faster improvement as shown by higher remission rate at week 2 with NNT = 8 compared to SSRIs. Somnolence rate was higher in mirtazapine and nausea rate was higher in SSRIs. In step IIa, combination therapy showed a more favorable time course than SSRIs monotherapy. For subjects taking SSRIs in step I, combination therapy showed significant better improvement in the Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D) score both at week 6 (p = 0.006) and 8 (p = 0.013) than SSRIs monotherapy. About 80% of responders at week 4 could reach remission at week 8 and 64% of non-responders could not reach remission at week 8 for patients who continued monotherapy. When mirtazapine was added on for SSRIs non-responders at week 4, the remission rate increased by 5% and HAM-D score improved by 4 points. While for mirtazapine non-responders, SSRIs add-on was not equally effective. Mirtazapine may provide a faster improvement and "non-response at week 4" may be indicator to mirtazapine add-on for patients receiving SSRIs.

Cognitive function and risperidone long-acting injection vs. paliperidone palmitate in schizophrenia: a 6-month, open-label, randomized, pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, long-acting injection (LAI) of second-generation antipsychotics has become a valuable strategy for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, few studies have compared the effects of different LAI antipsychotics on cognitive functions so far. The present study aimed to compare the influence of risperidone LAIs (RLAI) and paliperidone palmitate LAIs (PP) on cognitive function in outpatients with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this 6-month, open-label, randomized, and controlled study, 30 patients with schizophrenia who were treated with RLAIs were randomly allocated to the RLAI-continued group or the PP group. At baseline and 6 months, the patients were evaluated using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) that was the primary outcome of the study. The Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic drug treatment-Short form (SWNS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) scores were secondary outcome variables and they were tested at the same time points. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ in terms of PANSS, DIEPSS, or SWNS total score changes. However, the BACS score for the attention and processing speed item showed higher improvement in the PP group than the RLAI group (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary study suggest that PPs may improve attention and processing speed more than RLAIs. Anyway, a replication in a larger and double-blind study is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000014470 . Registered 10 July 2014.

The Comparative Effects of Risperidone Long-Acting Injection and Paliperidone Palmitate on Social Functioning in Schizophrenia: A 6-Month, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) and paliperidone palmitate (PP) on non-acute-phase social functioning in patients with schizophrenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 6-month pilot, open-label, randomized controlled study, 30 patients with schizophrenia who had been treated with RLAI were randomly allocated to the RLAI continuation group or switched to the PP group. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 6 months with the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) as the primary outcome variable and University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment Brief (UPSA-B), Social Emotional Cognition Task (SECT), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) scores as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, the two groups did not significantly differ in demographic or clinical features. The two groups did not differ in total score changes for the UPSA-B, the SECT, the PANSS, and the DIEPSS. However, the total scores and the two subscales of the SFS, i.e. independence-competence and independence-performance, were more improved in the PP group compared to the RLAI group (total scores, p = 0.038; competence, p = 0.001, and performance, p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PP may improve the total social functioning, independent life competence, and performance as compared to the RLAI group. However, these results are preliminary and need independent replication in larger samples before any definitive statement can be made.

Remifentanil in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), remifentanil is often used concurrently with anesthetics. The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive review on how the addition of remifentanil to anesthetics affects seizure duration and circulatory dynamics in mECT. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs that investigated seizure duration and circulatory dynamics in patients treated with ECT using anesthetics alone (non-remifentanil group) and with anesthetics plus remifentanil (remifentanil group). A total of 13 RCTs (380 patients and 1024 ECT sessions) were included. The remifentanil group showed a significantly prolonged seizure duration during ECT compared to the non-remifentanil group [motor: 9 studies, SMD = 1.25, 95 % CI (0.21, 2.29), p = 0.02; electroencephalogram: 8 studies, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI (0.14, 1.82), p = 0.02]. The maximum systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly reduced in the remifentanil group compared to the non-remifentanil group [7 studies, SMD = -0.36, 95 % CI (-0.65, 0.07), p = 0.02]. Substantial heterogeneity was observed for meta-analyses for seizure durations, but a pre-planned subgroup analysis revealed that seizure duration was prolonged only when the use of the anesthetic dose was reduced in the remifentanil group. The results of our study suggest that addition of remifentanil to anesthesia in ECT may lead to prolonged seizure duration when it allows the use of reduced anesthetic doses. Further, the addition of remifentanil was associated with reduced maximum SBP.

Serotonin 7 Receptor Variants Are Not Associated with Response to Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Japanese Schizophrenia Patients.

BACKGROUND: Individual differences in serotonin 7 receptor (5-HT7R) may result in variable response to antipsychotics with 5-HT7R antagonism. This study investigated the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 5-HT7R gene (HTR7) and the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotic drugs with a high affinity for this receptor in Japanese schizophrenia. METHODS: Perospirone or aripiprazole was administered to 100 patients with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled study. All patients were genotyped for three candidate SNPs (rs12412496, rs7916403, and rs1935349). Patient improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at 12 weeks was assessed as the primary outcome. PANSS 5-factor scores were investigated as the secondary outcome. RESULTS: Improvement on the PANSS total score and genetic polymorphisms showed no correlation. The rs12412496-rs7916403-rs1935349 A-T-A haplotype was correlated with worse improvement in the cognition score (haplotype frequency: 0.285, p = 0.046, permuted p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results show that HTR7 variants are not related to the overall improvement in schizophrenia symptoms.

Antagonist and partial agonist at the dopamine D2 receptors in drug-naïve and non-drug-naïve schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial.

Few data are available on the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics with different dopamine D2 receptor (D2-R)-binding properties in drug-naïve and non-drug-naïve schizophrenia. Thus, we aimed to assess whether antipsychotic medication history influences efficacy and tolerability in schizophrenia, based on a randomized controlled study of antipsychotics with mechanisms involving either full antagonism or partial agonism of D2-R. Patients with schizophrenia were recruited and given perospirone or aripiprazole in a 12-week, flexible-dose, open-label, randomized controlled study. Data were analyzed after dividing the patients into antipsychotic-naïve and antipsychotic-treated group according to antipsychotic medication histories. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale, and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale. In patients receiving perospirone, the antipsychotic-naïve group (n = 22) showed greater symptom improvement than that shown by the antipsychotic-treated group (n = 29), as assessed by efficacy evaluation scales such as the PANSS total, positive, and excited component score (p = .006, p < .001, p = .003, respectively). In patients receiving aripiprazole, however, there was no significant difference in efficacy between the antipsychotic-naïve (n = 18) and antipsychotic-treated (n = 31) groups. No significant intra-group or inter-group difference was noted with respect to any of the tolerability-related parameters assessed. The present study data support the hypothesis that antipsychotic medication history may influence efficacy in patients who receive a D2-R full antagonist but not a D2-R partial agonist.

HTR1A Gene Polymorphisms and 5-HT1A Receptor Partial Agonist Antipsychotics Efficacy in Schizophrenia.

Individual differences in serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptor may result in variable response to antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism. We investigated the relationship between 5-HT1A receptor gene (HTR1A) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and efficacy of antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Perospirone or aripiprazole was administered to 100 patients with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled study. Candidate SNPs were rs6295 (which affects HTR1A expression and function), rs1364043, rs878567, and rs10042486. Efficacy at week 12 of treatment was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-factor subscales (excitement/hostility, depression/anxiety, cognition, positive, and negative). Rs1364043 T allele was correlated with the percent change in the PANSS 5-factor negative score (P < 0.01). Haplotype analysis showed that the rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 T-C-G haplotype was correlated with worse negative score improvement (haplotype frequency, 0.675; P = 0.014), and the relatively rare T-G-T haplotype correlated with better efficacy (haplotype frequency, 0.05; P = 0.031). This is the first study to show that rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 HTR1A variants may be correlated with the improvement of the PANSS 5-factor negative score during treatment with 5-HT1A partial agonist antipsychotics. Studies with larger sample sizes and in different ethnic groups are warranted.